Dodgers
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal Quantrill | 26 | Majors | SP | Medium | 4 | 33.7 | 14.4 | 19.3 | 17.4 | 21.2 | 25.1 |
Total Value:
21.2
Guardians
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Gonsolin | 27 | Majors | SP | Low | 4 | 21.6 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 8.4 | 10.5 | 12.6 | |
| Alex Vesia | 25 | Majors | LHRP | Medium | 5 | 12.5 | 5.2 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 7.3 | 8.8 | |
| Mitch White | 26 | Majors | RHRP | SP | Medium | 5 | 8.5 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
Total Value:
21.2
I'm trying to do a trade with all 30 MLB teams and I decided to do this one because the Guardians are selling high on Quantrill for 3 pitchers that they have control on for a long time. Sorry if you disagree.
I understand and there's nothing wrong with creating proposals with all 30 teams. However, this is not "selling high" on Quantrill. He is just entering his prime and only got a real opportunity to start last season. Take a look at the results and he is not a FA until 2026. All I'm saying is that it makes 0 sense from Cleveland's POV while making complete sense from LA's. I try to be fair in my deals as that is the only way to keep this site fun IMO.