Pirates
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Rooker | 29 | Majors | DH | OF | Medium | 3 | 56.5 | 25.5 | 31 | 24.8 | 31 | 37.2 |
Total Value:
31
Athletics
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Davis | 24 | Majors | C | OF | 5 | 12.8 | 0 | 12.8 | 10.2 | 12.8 | 15.4 | |
| Luis Ortiz | 25 | Majors | SP | 5 | 20.4 | 9.2 | 11.2 | 9 | 11.2 | 13.5 | ||
| Thomas Harrington | 23 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 7.2 | 9 | 10.8 |
Total Value:
33
The scenario I had in mind for this trade is if John Fisher tells his management team that the target date for a contention window to open is the Vegas arrival in 2028. Yeah, it would certainly make the A’s worse in the short-term, but maybe Davis could benefit from a change in scenery (like Bleday did with you guys just this year).
Bleday came over in a much smaller Challenge trade for an oft-injured RP. As for Fisher... he's a silver spoon scumbag and you can't trust a word out if his mouth BUT he has said he wants to ramp up spending while in Sacramento. That he, in essence, wants a full blown Contender in Las Vegas Day 1. Still, Rooker is not on track to be around when the Vegas move happens and if the A's can get impact help then maybe a trade makes sense. A change of scenery bat and a backend SP doesn't qualify as impact help.