Giants & Guardians & Cardinals
Submitted by: DelusionalGiant
Giants
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tommy Edman | 29 | Majors | 2B | SS | Low | 2 | 24.8 | 16.3 | 8.5 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 10.2 |
Total Value:
8.5
Guardians
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Austin Slater | 31 | Majors | OF | Medium | 1 | 8.6 | 4 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 5.5 | |
John King | 29 | Majors | RP | Medium | 4 | 8.8 | 5.5 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 4.1 | |
Landen Roupp | 25 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
Total Value:
11.2
Cardinals
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sam Hentges | 27 | Majors | RP | Medium | 4 | 21.8 | 9.5 | 12.3 | 9.8 | 12.3 | 14.8 |
Total Value:
12.3
Comments
4I doubt Cards trade Edman, but I want the Giants to try some way somehow.
Cleveland is not trading Hentges.
How does this benefit Cleveland? That's rhetorical because I already know that this is a shit package for our best LHRP who is arguably one of our best BP arms period. Cleveland is just not interested in becoming a lesser team in order to make others better. If you put any thought whatsoever into this deal you wouldn't have posted it. I ain't mad and I don't need to "touch some grass". Just calling a spade a spade.
Hentges has the wrong rating for availability, @Blitzer can you switch Hentges availability to low rather than Medium because all the Guardians fans will agree its extremely unlikely, outside of an overpay Hentges is going anywhere in the 24 and 25 season... Either way if you want Hentges it's a major overpay and this is an underpay they would want nothing to do with