Dodgers & Rays

Submitted by: infiniteemperor12321

Dodgers

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Isaac Paredes25Majors3BLow492.427.564.951.964.977.8

Total Value:

64.9

Rays

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Max Muncy33Majors1B3BLow347.23413.210.613.215.9
Miguel Vargas24Majors1B3BLow524.75.619.115.319.122.9
River Ryan25MinorsSP0009.989.911.9
Dalton Rushing22MinorsC00017.714.217.721.3

Total Value:

59.9

You found a premium feature!

Want an ad-free experience, with access to our premium features, like the Team Rankings, GM Override, Player Rankings, and Future Trade/Free Agent/Extension Values Graphs?

infiniteemperor12321

Following from the previous trade, assuming the dodgers acquire Yama and Hader the only "weakish" positions would be 3b and 2b. The solution to 2b I theorized was Kim, as while there are already many bats a premium defensive player could be useful. To solve the 3b problem we look at the Rays, who the dodgers consistently trade with. In return for padres, who has years of control (just in time for the 6th Ohtani year luxury tax reset) the Dodgers give up a significant portion of their farm with top prospects plus cost-controlled replacements with significant projected production and the ability to replace the player at 3b. Rays also recieve one of the top dodger pitching prospects to work their "Tampa pitching lab" magic on. This would make the Dodger lineup,, in return for a decent portion of the farm (which can be refilled over 5 years before the start of the second phase of the Ohtani dodgers) Ohtani,, Freeman, Betts, Kim, Paredes... Baseball porn right there,

General Manager Badge
mp2891

Rays would probably reject this trade. They won't have any interest in paying Muncy $11MM per year, and the positions that Muncy and Vargas play are about as stacked as they can be with the Rays.

NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!