Giants & White Sox & Padres

Submitted by: zacharym

Giants

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Andrew Benintendi29MajorsOFLow426.166.4-40.3-48.3-40.3-32.2
Luis Robert26MajorsCFVery low4152.367.584.867.884.8101.7

Total Value:

44.5

White Sox

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Thairo Estrada28Majors2BSSMedium344.622.821.817.421.826.2
Grant McCray22MinorsOF00086.489.6
Aeverson Arteaga20MinorsSS0008.97.18.910.6
Joe Whitman22MinorsSP0005.74.65.76.8

Total Value:

44.40

Padres

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh

Total Value:

0

General Manager Badge
BigOwe

Pretty sure Giants end up with WAY too many OFers, in this scenario. Was pads inclusion a way to mitigate that?

General Manager Badge
zacharym

No, started with a 3-team idea but changed my mind and reselected 2-team option. Finished my White Sox to Giants trade but it posted it as a 3-team trade. Don’t know what happened never had this happen before. I infer that I should always use the clear trade button instead of the changing a trade from 3-team to 2-team. This trade for remaking the outfield is based on the premise that the Giants would make several trades to bring in higher ceiling talent and players which better fit together to form a dynamic and entertaining roster, even if that means a completely or mostly different roster. This trade in conjunction with the ones I put together for Padres, Reds, Orioles, Yankees, Rays and/or Angles. Such as, LF Soto or Arozarena, CF Robert, and RF Benintendi or Yaz as the primary outfielders and where the infielders are 3B Merrill, SS Holliday, 2B Marte or Luciano, and 1B Wade/Flores. Of course these trades assume several other teams have sufficiently pressing needs that the Giants can satisfy by trading from strengths to acquire a sum of other strengths.

NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!