Athletics & Guardians
Submitted by: grover
Athletics
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angel Martinez | 22 | Majors | 3B | 5 | 12.3 | 4.3 | 8 | 6.4 | 8 | 9.5 | ||
| Jackson Humphries | 20 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 5.7 |
Total Value:
12.8
Guardians
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joey Estes | 22 | Majors | SP | 5 | 24.6 | 14.4 | 10.2 | 8.2 | 10.2 | 12.3 | ||
| Daniel Susac | 23 | Minors | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 |
Total Value:
12.7
Comments
6
If my math is right, both Martinez and Estes actually have 6 years team control remaining.
I feel like this is a deal, Cleveland has to think about, but I am not sure if Estes is someone Cleveland would specifically like for Martinez... On paper the I can understand the deal though
NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!
The values are correct as 6, but the Years column is only updated once the league makes it official. I know that's weird, but that's how we roll.
Weird, but understandable. Martinez was a no-doubt 6 year but Estes was a closer call. On a separate note... if a TBD Free Agent comes back with a Swing & Miss projection, that's the equivalent of a (probable) Milb contract, correct?
Correct. In that case they didn't meet the minimum threshold for an MLB contract.
Thank you.